Download e-book for kindle: Appositive relative clauses in English : discourse functions by Rudy Loock

By Rudy Loock

ISBN-10: 9027226326

ISBN-13: 9789027226327

ISBN-10: 9027288453

ISBN-13: 9789027288455

This publication sheds new gentle on Appositive Relative Clauses (ARCs), a constitution that's quite often studied from a in simple terms syntactic viewpoint, against Determinative (or Restrictive) Relative Clauses (DRCs). during this quantity, ARCs are tested from a discourse/pragmatic standpoint, independently of DRCs, in an effort to supply a good definition of the constitution. After a presentation of the morphosyntactic, semantic and pragmatic features of ARCs, a taxonomy in their services in discourse is validated for either written and spoken English in accordance with the result of a corpus-based research. Constraints are then outlined inside an information-packaging method of syntactic buildings to teach why audio system decide on ARCs over different competing allostructures, i.e. syntactic constructions that fulfil related discourse features (e.g. nominal appositives, self sustaining clauses, adverbials, noun premodifiers, topicalization). the outcome is a deeper figuring out of the richness of ARCs of their normal contexts of use.

Show description

Read or Download Appositive relative clauses in English : discourse functions and competing structures PDF

Similar grammar books

Lynne Truss's EATS, SHOOTS & LEAVES: WHY, COMMAS REALLY DO MAKE A PDF

Illuminating the comical confusion the lowly comma could cause, this re-creation of Eats, Shoots & Leaves makes use of full of life, subversive illustrations to teach how misplacing or leaving out a comma can switch the which means of a sentence thoroughly. This photo booklet is bound to elicit gales of laughter—and greater punctuation—from all who learn it.

Get Subordination (Oxford Studies in Typology and Linguistic PDF

This publication offers a typology of subordination platforms around the world's languages. conventional definitions of subordination are in accordance with morphosyntactic standards, resembling clausal embedding or non-finiteness. The booklet exhibits that those definitions are untenable in a cross-linguistic point of view, and offers a cognitively established definition of subordination.

Evolution and Revolution in Linguistic Theory by Héctor Campos PDF

This quantity provides essays via a number of the best figures within the forefront of theoretical linguistics in the framework of common grammmar. one of many first books to undertake the "minimalist" framework to syntactic research, it contains a significant essay by means of Noam Chomsky at the minimalist software and covers a variety of subject matters in syntax and morphology.

Extra resources for Appositive relative clauses in English : discourse functions and competing structures

Sample text

70) The possibility can’t be ruled out that she will call an early election. (Huddleston & Pullum 2002: 966) Finally, and contrary to what Huddleston & Pullum (2002) claim, there are examples in which an ARC precedes a DRC, and these examples are perfectly acceptable. The DRC is separated from its antecedent by a digression marked by 25 26 Appositive Relative Clauses in English punctuation. For that kind of sentence to be acceptable, the only condition is that the DRC be the only element that follows the ARC (Emonds 1979: 222): (71) We found that movie, which cost plenty, that you so highly recommended.

French ARCs with sentential antecedents are not introduced by que/qui but ce que/ce qui or NP + que/qui (128): (127) J’ai trouvé un livre par terre, lequel avait été perdu par un étudiant. (= ARC) I have found a book on the floor, the which had been lost by a student. I found a book on the floor, which had been lost by a student. a. *J’ai trouvé un livre lequel avait été perdu par un étudiant. (= DRC) I found a book the which had been lost by a student. 12. We are not beyond reproach in this matter, especially in Chapter 1.

Commenting on these observations, Arnold (2004: 18) suggests that ARCs are interpreted semantically like independent clauses while retaining all the syntactic characteristics typical of embedded clauses. 2 De Vries (2002, 2006). Several researchers have explicitly argued in favor of the existence of a coordination link between an ARC and its host. Among them is De Vries, who suggests the existence of a specifying coordination link (symbolized ‘&:P’ in his work) between the ARC and its antecedent.

Download PDF sample

Appositive relative clauses in English : discourse functions and competing structures by Rudy Loock


by Kenneth
4.0

Rated 4.26 of 5 – based on 42 votes