By Bram Jagersma
Read Online or Download A descriptive grammar of Sumerian PDF
Similar grammar books
Illuminating the comical confusion the lowly comma may cause, this re-creation of Eats, Shoots & Leaves makes use of vigorous, subversive illustrations to teach how misplacing or leaving out a comma can switch the that means of a sentence thoroughly. This photograph publication is bound to elicit gales of laughter—and greater punctuation—from all who learn it.
This publication provides a typology of subordination structures around the world's languages. conventional definitions of subordination are in keeping with morphosyntactic standards, equivalent to clausal embedding or non-finiteness. The e-book indicates that those definitions are untenable in a cross-linguistic standpoint, and offers a cognitively established definition of subordination.
This quantity offers essays by way of many of the best figures within the forefront of theoretical linguistics in the framework of common grammmar. one of many first books to undertake the "minimalist" framework to syntactic research, it features a valuable essay by way of Noam Chomsky at the minimalist application and covers quite a number themes in syntax and morphology.
- Cognitive Poetics: Goals, Gains and Gaps (Applications of Cognitive Linguistics)
- Vocabulary:: Applied Linguistic Perspectives (2nd Edition)
- Language Processing and Second Language Development: Processability Theory
- Beja Pedagogical Grammar
- Definiteness and Indefiniteness: A Study in Reference and Grammaticality Prediction
- A grammar of Mosetén
Extra info for A descriptive grammar of Sumerian
Many regions are poorly documented. On the available evidence we can identify two main dialects during the second half of the third millennium BCE. In this grammar we will call them Northern and Southern Sumerian, following an old tradition to call the downstream area closer to the Arabian Gulf ‘South’ and the upstream area ‘North’. Strictly looking at the compass, we could just as easily call them Western and Eastern Sumerian. The relationship between these two main dialects changes across time and so do the linguistic properties in which they differ.
We have, of course, no way of knowing which language their occupants actually spoke. But even if they spoke a language that was a direct ancestor of Sumerian and gave their settlements perfectly transparent names in this language, both this language and its place names would have changed beyond recognition during the following millennia. What we do know about these early place names, however, is that similar ones are found across the entire area of Mesopotamia. Place names with final -ar or -ur are found in both northern Mesopotamia (Nagar, Assur, Gasur) and in the south (Sippar, Nippur).
That the rather uniform scribal traditions hide a great deal more from us is obvious from occasional slips into nonstandard spellings. g. ECTJ 81 3; N; 24). Such differences in pronunciation must have been common but are only rarely reflected in the written language. While the dominant written language during the Ur III period was a variety of Southern Sumerian, this changes during the subsequent, Old Babylonian period. The first centuries of the second millennium have yielded a great many unilingual Sumerian texts.
A descriptive grammar of Sumerian by Bram Jagersma